Friday, 28 September 2007

Housing Market uneffected by turmoil



House prices experienced another gain in September, however the trend growth of house prices is now the lowest since July 2006, with credit conditions now clearly tightening for leveraged borrowers.

Fionnuala Earley, Nationwide's chief economist, said:
"House prices recorded a reasonably strong gain of 0.7 per cent between August and September. Despite this increase, the 12-month rate of house price inflation came down to 9.0 per cent, as we are now entering a period during which house prices gains were particularly strong in 2006.

“This brought the average price of a typical UK property to £184,723. The 3-month on 3-month rate of price growth - often the smoothest indicator of underlying momentum - slowed from 2.0 per cent to 1.6 per cent, the lowest level since July 2006.

“Overall, house prices defied the gloomy predictions of some recent headlines, but their underlying growth is still on a decelerating trend.”

She said the financial turmoil has dampened hopes that the crisis will blow over quickly, with higher wholesale funding costs leading to a credit price reassessment in the mortgage market.
Earley continued: “As expected, this has not had an immediate impact on house prices, but the longer-term effect will undoubtedly be to take some of the froth out of the market.

“Over the last year, borrowers who have wished to extend themselves to the limit have been able to do so relatively cheaply in comparison to more restrained borrowers. While some lenders are still willing to extend loans with little or no deposit, such products are now more expensive, reflecting the extra risk involved.

“The difference in rates available on 95 per cent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) fixed rate mortgages and their 75 per cent LTV equivalent soared in August. The average market rate for a 95 per cent LTV 2-year fixed rate mortgage was 0.45 percentage points higher than the rate on a 75 per cent LTV equivalent in August, compared with only 0.29 percentage points in July and a low of 0.23 points in April.

She urged intermediaries and borrowers alike to heed the warning that risk must always have its price. Earley also predicted that highly leveraged borrowing will remain less attractive and lending volumes in this segment may decline.

Looking to the future, specifically the fallout this will have on interest rates, she advised: “The re-pricing of credit risk and the tightening of lending criteria is only one side of the credit crunch story. Events of the past two months now appear to mark a clear turning point in the interest rate outlook.

“Sentiment has changed significantly as the potential adverse economic impact of the credit crunch has been acknowledged by the MPC. The likelihood is now that we will see a cut in base rates early in 2008, which is good news for mainstream borrowers and those coming off fixed rate deals.

“The more dovish outlook for base rates is beginning to be reflected in swap rates – falling swap rates are an indication that upward pressure on mortgage pricing from the base rate environment is receding, at least in the short term.

“This implies that for mainstream borrowers with good credit quality and lower LTVs, credit conditions have not deteriorated as much as the headlines may suggest. It also suggests that payment shock for borrowers who need to re-mortgage in 2008 may not be quite as large as previously anticipated.”
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Monday, 24 September 2007

Women in Property

An overview of the Bradford & Bingley’s survey of 1,000 women in property


1 Research by Bradford & Bingley has revealed that female property investors are just as ambitious and switched on as their male counterparts, showing themselves to be master multi-taskers.


2 The survey of 1,000 women consolidated their position in the property market, showing over three-quarters of those questioned, or 76 per cent, successfully hold down day jobs in addition to managing their investment portfolios.


3 Alongside this, 42 per cent of women have taken on much of any renovation or improvement work needing to be done to a property themselves.


4 This broke down further, with 35 per cent of women already having taken on improvement or renovation work, and 7 per cent who have and would do it again.


5 Yet, while 90 per cent of female property investors deal personally with trades people, 48 per cent of these felt that trades people quoted them higher prices purely because they are a woman.


6 Despite such hurdles, 26 per cent intend to invest in further properties within the next 12 months.


7 The research was commissioned to mark the launch of Bradford & Bingley’s Property Woman of the Year Awards, which recognise the success of women in the property investment market.


8 A third of women in property were 30 years of age or under when they bought their first investment property, the study indicated.


9 This bucked the national average of 34 years old, Bradford & Bingley’s research into women and the property investment market stated.


10 According to the research, 21 per cent of women in the property investment market were over the age of 50 when they bought their first investment property.


11 Bradford & Bingley suggested that age, as well as gender, was no barrier to property investment.


12 According to the women in property investment report, 59 per cent of those questioned cited investment potential as a key motivator to buy a property.


13 47 per cent indicated that property was viewed by them as a pension replacement.


14 Looking at the financial rewards of property investment, of those questioned, 10 per cent of women made £50,000 or more when they sold their investment properties.


15 9 per cent earn £10,000 a year or more on their property investments, Bradford & Bingley’s study indicated.


16 Fiona Fullerton, who owns several investment properties to the value of over £2million, said: “Women are taking control by buying and renovating properties and are being hugely successful at it. Many women have strong business sense and when combined with an innate ability to multitask and a key eye for design, it can often create a winning formula.”


17 Fiona Curtin, buy-to-let expert at Bradford & Bingley, commented: “The last few years have seen a huge growth in the number of women investing in property.”


18 All statistics quoted were taken from Bradford & Bingley’s survey into women in buy-to-let, commissioned through YouGov.


19 YouGov conducted the survey between 22-29 August 2007 on a sample of 1,025 female property investors.


20 The Bradford & Bingley survey into women and property investment and development was conducted online, with all data unweighted.

Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Mortgage Rates of the Week

Mortgage of the week 24 September, 2007


Short Term Fixed Rate

The Nationwide is offering a two year fixed rate deal, at a rate of 5.78%, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.24%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.4% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of the mortgage during the fixed rate period. There is a valuation fee of £295 and an arrangement fee of £999.


Long Term Fixed Rate


The Nationwide is offering a five year fixed rate deal, at a rate of 5.98%, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.24%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.1% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of the mortgage during the fixed rate period. There is a valuation fee of £295 and an arrangement fee of £599 that can be added to the loan.


Short Term Discount or Tracker

The Nationwide is offering a two year tracker scheme at the Bank of England base rate minus 0.27%, equating to 5.48%, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.24%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.30% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of this mortgage within two years. There is a valuation fee of £295 and an arrangement fee of £599 that can be added to the loan.


Long Term Discount or Tracker

The Norwich & Peterborough is offering a five year discounted scheme at 2.15% off its standard rate, equivalent to a current rate of 5.59%, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.74%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.1% APR. There is an early redemption penalty upon repayment of this loan up to the end of the discount period. There is valuation fee of £220 and an arrangement fee of £599 that can be added to the loan.


Cashback

The Abbey is offering a five year tracker mortgage at the Bank of England base rate plus 1.54%, currently 7.29%, with a 5% cashback on completion. The overall cost for comparison is 7.9% APR. There is a requirement to repay the cashback on early repayment of the loan within the incentive period. There is a free valuation and no arrangement fee.


Buy to Let

Mortgage Express is offering a two year tracker buy to let deal at the Bank of England base rate minus 0.66%, equating to 5.09%, reverting to their standard variable rate, currently 7.5%, at the end of the period. The overall cost for comparison is 7.7% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of this mortgage during the first two years of the loan. There is a valuation fee of £354, while the arrangement fee of £2500 can be added to the loan. There is no guarantee that it will be possible to arrange continuous letting of the property nor that the rental income will be sufficient to meet the cost of the mortgage.


Remortgage

For those looking to remortgage, the Bank of Ireland is offering a discounted mortgage until the 30th September 2009 at 1.85% off its standard variable rate, equating to a current rate of 5.99%, reverting to the standard variable rate of 7.84% for the remaining term of the mortgage. The overall cost for comparison is 7.8% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of this mortgage during the fixed rate period. This mortgage offers a free valuation, free legal work and no arrangement fee. Your existing lender may impose penalties if you switch your mortgage to a new lender.


Lifetime Tracker

The Norwich & Peterborough is offering a lifetime tracker deal at the Bank of England base rate plus 0.24% for the full term of the loan, currently equating to 5.99%. The overall cost for comparison is 6.3%. There is no Early Repayment Charge on this loan, but there is a valuation fee of £220 and an arrangement fee of £499, which can be added to the mortgage.


100% Mortgage

Mortgage Express is offering a fixed rate deal at 6.25% until the 31st October 2009, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.75%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.8% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of this mortgage during the discount period. There is no valuation fee, but an arrangement fee of £1499 that can be added to the mortgage.


Capped Rate Mortgage

Accord Mortgages is offering a tracker mortgage at a current rate of 6.04%, capped for three years to a maximum rate of 6.29%, reverting to the standard variable rate for the remaining term of the mortgage, currently 7.75%. The overall cost for comparison is 7.7% APR. An Early Repayment Charge is payable if you repay all or part of this mortgage during the capped rate period. There is a valuation fee of £260, and an arrangement fee of £995 that can be added to the loan.


Figures based on £150,000 purchase price or value and £100,000 repayment mortgage over 25 years. All figures are subject to revision, but current at time of going to press.

Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. In certain circumstances Kinetic may charge a fee for arranging your mortgage. A typical fee could be up to 0.5% of the loan arranged.


Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Lending into retirement

With signs that the FSA is to focus on advised mortgages going over into retirement


These days, people are carrying ever larger debts later into life. It is now increasingly common to see new mortgages arranged with terms that stretch beyond borrowers' planned retirement ages.

On the face of it, this is an alarming trend, so it is not surprising that the FSA recently investigated how lenders meet their obligation to assess borrowers' ability to afford the mortgage beyond their retirement. The FSA reported some examples of good practice from lenders who evidently take this obligation very seriously. For example, some lenders' application systems automatically ask for additional affordability details, whenever the requested term goes beyond normal retirement age.


But the FSA's findings also highlighted some poor practice examples. These include making no attempt to assess affordability during underwriting – and then adding clauses to offer letters, warning clients they should be happy that they will be able to cope with payments after they retire; not considering affordability unless clients are due to retire in less than five years – on the grounds they will probably have remortgaged to another lender by the time they retire; and relying on brokers to vouch that clients will be able to afford the mortgage after retirement – without bothering to ask them what criteria they use to reach this conclusion.

So what issues does this raise for mortgage intermediaries and why does it matter? For a start, lenders can be expected to take a closer interest in post-retirement affordability, now the FSA has made its expectations clear. It is also highly likely the FSA will soon get around to looking at whether advisers are carrying out proper assessments on the affordability of mortgages that carry on past retirement age.

Mortgage advisers are not expected to carry a crystal ball around when assessing affordability. But advisers do have a duty to consider future events that they should be aware of at the time they give their advice, and this will impact on a client's ability to repay. An obvious example is when the adviser knows the borrower is due to retire halfway through the mortgage term. Common sense dictates income is likely to fall significantly at that point.

In practice, assessing affordability beyond retirement is often impossible in any meaningful way. In some cases it is possible to predict roughly how much income clients will have in retirement, such as people who have been members of public sector final salary pension schemes all their working lives, and who are only a few years away from retiring. But, in most cases, mortgage advisers will not have any real idea what their client's post-retirement income will be. In this situation, advisers really should not be recommending a term that goes beyond that point.


Kinetic is seeing more interest-only mortgages being taken out by people who have already retired – for example, to fund ­purchases of holiday homes. Odd as it may seem, these cases are often safer for advisers than those involving people who are currently working, but who are due to retire during the term. If clients have already retired, their retirement income is a known fact, so the adviser can carry out an affordability assessment in the normal way. For clients with a good retirement income, but who need to raise capital, an interest-only mortgage can be a viable, and cheaper, alternative to equity release products.

The message is simple. Advisers should ensure that they are looking after their clients' interests, and their own, by fully documenting any advice, particularly when it relates to sensitive issues such as mortgages running into retirement.

Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Saturday, 22 September 2007

The Ripple Effect


The global financial markets have taken something of a battering in recent months, headed by the non-conforming crisis affecting the US market.
US lender Countrywide Financial recently laid off 12,000 staff and predicted that business levels would drop by 25 per cent in the coming 12 months, while American Home Mortgage (AHMC) filed for bankruptcy in August, citing market turmoil as the reason for their closure.
The problems in the US stem from the differences in the economies, with the US market dominated by an over-supply of housing and a different approach to mortgage lending. Until the recent crisis it was commonplace for borrowers to be able to obtain 100 per cent self-cert offerings, with so-called ‘ninja’ loans – no income, no job or assets, also valid, up to 98 per cent loan-to-value (LTV) exacerbating the crisis.
The regulatory situation is much weaker in the US and the crisis has forced a number of lenders into administration and also led to increased tension in the wider financial market, resulting in a ‘global credit crunch’. The White House was also forced into action, with President Bush introducing tax breaks for home owners struggling to meet mortgage repayments, and launching a programme of limited federal aid for refinancing to stem the non-conforming crisis.
He also moved to quell growing discontent with the US financial services sector, and in an effort to reassure borrowers indicated that the US economy was strong. “Recent disturbances in the non-conforming mortgage industry are modest, modest in relation to the size of our economy,” he said. However, it has been closer to home that much of the uncertainty has come from.
An adverse impact
Despite many market analysts suggesting that the US market drop would not impact the UK market, it has become clear over recent weeks that the UK sector has been adversely impacted, with Northern Rock the most high profile ‘casualty’ so far. While most lenders have reined in their product offerings and re-adjusted their products, particularly in the non-conforming sector, others have stepped back from the market all together.
Lenders have re-adjusted their products and criteria on a weekly, if not daily basis, reining in the LTVs, tweaking the rates and restricting the borrower criteria to promote a more stringent lending procedure in the face of increased market adversity.
Market opportunities
Over the past 12 months, many lenders realised the growing opportunity within specialist sectors – namely buy-to-let and non-conforming.
With statistics indicating that borrowers who, through financial defaults, debts or bankruptcy are forced to choose a non-conforming product are continuing to increase, it came as no surprise to see lenders, including recent entrants db mortgages and Alliance & Leicester (A&L), enter the fray in 2006. Statistics from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) backed up this statement, reporting that the number of mortgages in arrears of three months or more at the end of June 2007 rose to an estimated 125,100.
The number of properties taken into possession in the first six months of 2007 rose by nearly 18 per cent compared with the previous half-year, and nearly 30 per cent compared with the first half of 2006, the CML stated, which equated to around one in 840 mortgages ending in possession in the first half of 2007. As a result, it was no surprise that lenders began dipping their toes into the non-conforming sector.
While the previous 12 months had perhaps seen lenders cautious in their approach, following formal regulation of the mortgage market by the Financial Services Authority, the 12 months that followed led to a market diversification, particularly among lenders. Lenders realised that the prime market could not generate enough of an income stream and began to look at opportunities in other sectors, mainly near-prime and buy-to-let. However at the time, established lenders in the non-conforming field, including Kensington Mortgages, stressed the need for lenders not to entertain the idea of a ‘quick buck’, suggesting that those operating in the non-conforming sector had to be in it for the long haul.
This seems to have come back to bite Northern Rock, which had to obtain emergency funding from the Bank of England, and it is only now in the market conditions we are currently experiencing that the UK sector has undergone a ‘mini-crisis’, with Bill Dudgeon, managing director at db mortgages, suggesting that the UK market was ‘currently in intensive care.’
A rock and a hard place
Due to its lending strategy, Northern Rock has felt the pinch more than most. While most lending institutions rely on customers making deposits into savings accounts to help their balance sheets, the Northern Rock strategy places a large emphasis on its mortgage business. Unlike other banks, Northern Rock raises most of its money by borrowing from other financial institutions – a strategy that has become harder following the global crunch, with Northern Rock unable to obtain funding from US institutions. Indeed, speculation has hinted that potential bidders for the organisation from other lenders and banks had found funding to acquire the lender difficult in the current financial climate. In a statement, Adam J Applegarth, chief executive of Northern Rock, admitted that the non-conforming crisis had led the lender to reassess its strategy and place in the market.
He said: “We are seeing extreme conditions in global liquidity, which have impacted on world markets. As a result, we have taken prudent action to rein back our lending until markets normalise. Against that background it is inevitable, albeit disappointing, that our profits will be affected. We remain focused on prime lending in the UK mortgage market and our credit quality remains robust. "The support of the Bank of England through this facility reflects a recognition that Northern Rock is solvent, exceeds its regulatory capital requirement and has a good quality loan book. In these extreme times we are pleased to have a high quality asset base and remain confident in the excellence of our strong customer franchise, our efficient business platform and our well-known brand.” Following this move consumers moved quickly to withdraw their money out of the organisation, at a speculated rate of £10,000 per second.
Over the weekend, it was predicted that Northern Rock had seen borrowers take out an estimated two billion pounds, despite the lender, the FSA and the government reiterating to borrowers that their money is safe. Callum McCarthy, chairman of the FSA, said: “The FSA’s judgement on Northern Rock is that we believe it is solvent, meets all capital requirements and has a good quality loan book. We are clear it should continue to be open for business. “More generally, it is important to remember that the UK banking industry has entered this period of severe market turbulence after several years of very strong market conditions which have helped it build up healthy balance sheets and strong capital positions. “The FSA remains confident about the industry's ability to withstand current market pressures.
We are in constant dialogue with firms to ensure that they are vigilant with regard to potential risks and continue to carefully monitor developments.” McCarthy added: “To be absolutely clear, if we believed that Northern Rock was not solvent, we would not have allowed it to remain open for business. It is open for business and it can continue to receive deposits and allow customers to make withdrawals.” Michael Coogan, director-general at the CML, added: “The Bank of England would not have provided the loan to Northern Rock if it had concerns about the quality of the lender’s own business. “All lenders are facing funding pressure at the moment, and what they need is a return to more normal market conditions as quickly as possible. We welcome the Bank’s intervention and confirmation that it is keeping a close eye on the situation.”
However, despite the government, the lender and the regulator all calling for calm, the last time that a bank required ‘bailing out’ from the Bank of England was 1973, and it is to be expected that consumers will fear the worst. Indeed in a BBC Newsnight programme, a number of Northern Rock borrowers suggested that they did not believe the government, following years of ‘spin.’ While Gordon Brown has undoubtedly made moves away from the ‘spin era’ of Blair and Alastair Campbell, many remain wary of government pledges.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics
Despite Chancellor Alastair Darling calling for calm, it is clear that many consumers simply do not believe the government. This is perhaps the most worrying aspect of the affair, and the government will have to act fast to restore faith. While the previous decade has seen economic growth, spearheaded by Gordon Brown’s tenure as Chancellor, his move to Prime Minister has coincided with the ‘worst financial crisis in a generation’ according to some.
Lending strategies and the role of the FSA are undoubtedly under scrutiny as a result of this ‘credit crunch’ and has suggested that it plans to make changes to the current bank deposits rulings. FSA chief executive, Hector Sants, admits the plans in place need to be re-examined in light of recent market changes. “There have been a number of factors affecting confidence, but it is clear that investors are aware of the limitations of the scheme and, in the light of events, it would be right to look at it again.” For borrowers, it is clear that a certain amount of concern is gripping the market – with Northern Rock forced to open its doors earlier to cope with the demand – and the industry must do the best it can to quell this concern. However with pragmatism key to many borrowers outlook, it came as no surprise to see other lenders seeing drops in their share prices.
While Northern Rock was the most severely hit, with shares at one point down 40 per cent, A&L and Bradford & Bingley also experienced marked drops, although all of the lenders concerned reported a subsequent re-adjustment of share prices, with A&L shares dropping by over 30 per cent, before realigning itself. An A&L spokesperson also confirmed that it had seen no increase in branch activity and did not expect its business model to be overly stretched, because of the different lending model it has in place.
Although A&L relies on mortgages for a proportion of their business, the strategy in place differs from the Northern Rock plan. A statement by Bradford & Bingley also moved to allay fears over its lending policy, despite the lender experiencing a fall in share prices of over 10 per cent. A B&B spokesperson, said: “We are a well-funded company with a broad funding base of retail savings allied to a cost-effective secured funding programme. Earlier this Summer we pre-funded by completing a £2.5 billion master trust securitisation and a £2.5 billion covered bond issuance.”
Quick to ask questions
In the market environment it is clear that the government, the regulator and lenders will all be under fire for their strategies. Conservative leader, David Cameron, has been very quick to question the government’s strategy and commitment to the financial sector, and consumers have expressed their own worries over the market, which will undoubtedly remain for some time.
The government needs to ensure that it keeps the public fully informed of the moves being made, and the FSA may, as a result of recent market movement, become a more prominent figure for consumers. It is up to the industry to learn from this recent turbulence, and make sure the ripples that have been caused by the market tumoil do not have a lasting effect on what has been one of the most stable economies in the world.
Think mortgages, think kinetic.....

Friday, 21 September 2007

Mortgage lending slows down in September


Gross mortgage lending by banks, building societies and specialist lenders fell by 6% in August compared with July, to an estimated £32.2 billion from £34.1 billion, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders. This was 3% down on the £33 billion figure for August last year. The figures are not seasonally adjusted.

The lending figures published today relate to a period when the current wholesale funding pressures being experienced in the market were less pronounced. During September, a number of lenders have withdrawn lending products, amended their lending criteria, or re-priced their deals. Not all the re-pricing has had the effect of increasing the cost to the consumer; some lenders have reduced the rates on their fixed rate mortgage products.

It is too soon to say with accuracy what September lending volumes are likely to show, although initial indications suggest that lending remains robust. The reduction in available funding could in due course translate through to a reduced supply of lending, although the Bank of England's most recent interventions to support liquidity in the interbank lending market may help to restore the availability of funding more quickly than would otherwise have been the case.

Commenting on the data and the current situation,
CML Director General Michael Coogan said:

"Lending fell slightly in August, but was still at very high levels. We see no obvious decline in consumer demand, although some decrease in the supply of lending is being experienced in the short term as a result of the problems lenders face in raising wholesale funding.
"The events of the past week have shown us how very quickly situations can change.
Even after the good news on inflation falling back, the Fed's rate cut, and the Bank of England's support for 3-month funding, it is not a given that the Bank will follow suit on cutting rates. It makes sense for consumers to continue to plan for rates at or about their current levels for the foreseeable future - we are not out of the woods yet."
unbiased advice, exceptional service

CML propose changes to APR

CML Housing Finance Issue 06
2007 September 2007

Mortgages - informing customer choice

The Annual Percentage Rate (APR) is currently the standard measure for comparing the costs of loans, and one that must be disclosed to borrowers. A key assumption that underpins the APR calculation is that loans will be held until maturity. But, in today's intensely competitive market, most mortgages are repaid after just a few years, and this means that APR information can often be irrelevant or confusing. This paper proposes a new interest rate measure - the Dynamic Annual Rate (DAR) – that presents cost information across a wide range of different mortgage products in a simple and effective way.

The DAR differs from the APR in two key respects: it is calculated for any period of time for which the loan may be kept (rather than only the full term as in the APR); and it takes into account all payments and charges, including any early repayment charge and exit fee, over the period for which the mortgage is held. DARs contain a lot of information, and can be used to show how the true cost of a mortgage varies over time.

They allow straightforward cost comparisons between mortgage products over any period that a borrower is likely to hold them for. The DAR approach could also help borrowers better understand how future changes in interest rates would affect the costs associated with different mortgage products and when product switching would be worthwhile. DARs offer several potential advantages over the APR, and may help advisers satisfy their Treating Customers Fairly requirements by providing information to borrowers that is easily understood, clear, fair and not misleading.

A new measure of mortgage value

The market for domestic mortgages is highly competitive. A large number of lenders offer a vast range of products, including fixed-rate, initial discount, tracker and cashback mortgages. And within these groupings, there are further significant variations in such things as interest rates, set-up charges, cashback or introductory discount incentives and early redemption charges.

Authors Frank Chacko Consulting Actuary, Grant Thornton Editor Bob Pannell Head of Research, CML

In theory, such choice provides the opportunity for borrowers to select the most suitable product for their needs. However, increasing product complexity means consumers often have a poor understanding of the mortgage product they purchase despite the wealth of information given to them. In particular, it is arguable whether or not borrowers are able to make an informed choice as regards to comparative value.

Under the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) Principle 6 for businesses, all regulated firms including mortgage advisers, are required to 'treat customers fairly' (TCF). Whether or not customers understand the product, the obligation is on advisers to communicate costs clearly and fairly. Firms are also obliged to ensure that any advice provided to their customers is suitable. Closely aligned to this obligation is Principle 7, which requires firms to provide information to their clients in a way which is clear, fair and not misleading. It is not clear how the obligations under TCF (that require firms to communicate price information in a way that is clear, fair and not misleading) can best be met by using the tools currently prescribed. The measure that supposedly helps with the comparison of mortgage costs is the Annual Percentage Rate, or APR.

But the APR is of limited value for mortgage comparison purposes because most loans typically last for less than five years. In this article, we present a new approach to presenting mortgage cost information - the Dynamic Annual Rate. The approach offers a simple and effective way to evaluate the true cost of a mortgage, how costs vary over time, and how they compare with other mortgages. First, though, we consider the APR and its shortcomings. Problems with the APR The APR historically arose from the need to compare costs on hire purchase and other short term loans. It effectively produced an average rate of interest over the full period of a loan, so allowing consumers to compare in advance the relative costs of loans which had differing interest rates, fees and other charges.

The formula specifically excluded allowance for default charges and, by implication, the fees payable on early redemption, because it assumed borrowers kept the agreement and held it for the full term. A simple example of the APR may be useful. For a four year loan where 4% applies for the first two years and 6% applies for the second two years, the APR would be roughly 5% per annum, reflecting the average rate of interest applying over the four year period of the loan.

The same principles apply if the loan carries initial charges - we calculate an average rate of interest which treats the initial charges as an addition to the interest rate spread over the full term. For short term loans, the APR works well and represents a very helpful standard measure. It is a simple measure; it is relevant since the majority of such loans are held for the full term; it provides a valid measure for comparing different loan costs. Furthermore, its extension for long-term products such as mortgages was reasonable when mortgages were generally held for long periods.

Mortgages - informing customer choice

However, over the last thirty years mortgage products have changed considerably and today are far more complex than they were in the 1970s. Consumer behaviour and the role of intermediaries have also changed significantly, with far greater emphasis on product switching and value for money considerations. In recent years, around half of all mortgage sales have been remortgages. Therefore, even though the majority of mortgages are taken out with original maturities of 25 or more years, they are often kept for just a few years. Over time, the APR formula has remained fundamentally the same, despite its underlying assumptions not remaining entirely valid in the environment of more complex products and very different consumer behaviour.

The main issue that arises is whether a measure that provides the average rate of interest over the full period of a mortgage, say 25 years, is useful when mortgages today last for far less time. Furthermore, because of the short period for which many mortgages are held, the early repayment charge (ERC) is a significant item of cost for many borrowers, but it is not an item that features in the APR formula (by definition). As a result, the APR – a piece of information that must be disclosed to borrowers – measures costs over a time period that is irrelevant for the vast majority of borrowers. It is this aspect which lies at the heart of the problem: the average rate of interest charged over the period most mortgages are typically held, such as four or five years, generally bears little relation to the APR calculated over 25 years

A new approach - the Dynamic Annual Rate

The new approach proposed in this article is similar in some ways to the APR, but differs in important respects. First, instead of forcing the term used in our calculation to be fixed as the maturity term of the mortgage, it is calculated for any time period up to the mortgage term. Secondly, allowance is made for all the charges and payments relevant for the period, including the early repayment charge. As a result, the equivalent average annual interest rate can be illustrated over the range of time periods for which a mortgage is likely to be held – we call this the Dynamic Annual Rate (DAR). The DAR, therefore, is a continuous measure that can be read off for any time period the consumer thinks they may keep the mortgage for.


Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Wednesday, 19 September 2007

Bank of England Cash Injection


19 September, 2007
The Bank of England (BoE) has announced it will inject £10bn into the UK money market. These funds will be auctioned off next week, in an attempt to bring three-month inter-bank interest rates down – even though the Bank previously stated that it was not its job to lower three-month rates. Another key feature of this move on the part of the BoE is that banks will be allowed to use a wider range of assets than usual as collateral, including mortgage debt.
The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has welcomed the decision. Michael Coogan, director general, said: "This support should enable 3-month funding costs to reduce and get back to more normal levels. This is good news for lenders and for their customers, particularly those with mortgages linked to LIBOR for whom hefty increases in payments were looming."
Following the excessive increases in the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) over the past few weeks which have seen it climb above both the Base Rate and the emergency lending rate of 6.75 per cent – however it dropped overnight in response to the cut in US Federal rates. Banks have been loathe to lend to other banks as a result of the recent instability within the global markets and thus the problem escalated until it reached a head last Friday with Northern Rock’s announcement.
Ian Kernohan, economist at RLAM, commented: “This represents a U-turn on support for money markets and so when faced with the risk of a collapse in confidence, all talk of moral hazard has gone out the window. As every parent knows, it’s all very well to talk tough, but if you don’t follow up your credibility is damaged.”
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Nationwide Housing Market Report


The Nationwide House Price Report 8 September 2007
1 The Nationwide House Price Report has revealed that, while house price growth rose by 0.6 per cent during August 2007, the annual rate continued to moderate, falling to 9.6 per cent from 9.9 per cent in July.
2 The report showed a typical property cost an average of £183,898 in August, £16,177 more than one year ago.
3 While the US non-conforming crisis has caused turmoil in the international financial markets, Nationwide said it was unlikely to have a significant additional effect on the rate of house price growth in the UK in the short term.
4 However, the report said the dependence of the UK economy on financial services posed a longer term risk.
5 Nationwide stated it still expected house price growth in 2007 to come close to the middle of its forecasted range of between 5 and 8 per cent.
6 It said the expected slowing of the market would result from three factors: weaker affordability; the effect of higher rates and inflation on consumers’ pockets; and lower house price expectations.
7 Fionnuala Earley, Nationwide’s group economist, said: “While it has taken some time for these factors to bite, there are now clearer signs of slower demand in the market.”
8 She added that the stock-to-sales ratio predicted a continued slowing in the annual rate of house price inflation.
9 It was felt that the long-term severity of the fallout from the US non-conforming debacle on the housing market would depend on the length of time it takes for market jitters to abate.
10 Nationwide said a prolonged financial market downturn would be uncomfortable for the overall economy.
11 It added such a downturn would not only affect investment bankers, but would also have negative knock-on effects for legal, accountancy and other professional services that have benefited from the structured credit boom.
12 Earley said that the impact on London property prices could only be negative compared to the current situation, particularly at the top end.
13 However, employment generated from Olympic and other infrastructure investment along with supply issues would remain positive factors.
14 She stated that the overall extent of any damage to economic growth and the housing market would depend on the length of the credit crunch and the response by the Bank of England.
15 The August Inflation Report suggested a rise in the Base Rate to 6 per cent was inevitable, but this is now in doubt.
16 The Bank’s forecast of inflation did not predict a drop below the 2 per cent target at any point over the next two years, even with rates rising to 6 per cent. Yet, inflation fell to 1.9 per cent in July.
17 Added to this was the suggestion that the economies of the UK’s main European trading partners were weakening alongside a likely slowdown in the US.
18 The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) had been using the strength of global and eurozone growth as an factor to support its tightening campaign.
19 Given these factors, together with the softer tone the last MPC minutes reflected, Nationwide believes rates will now remain at 5.75 per cent.
20 Earley said: “The Bank’s reluctance to intervene in the markets in the same way as the Fed and the European Central Bank suggests that at the moment it is fairly sanguine about the lasting effects of the credit crunch. The longer the squeeze continues, the more likely it is to have a dampening effect on the economy and hence the outlook for house price growth next year.”
unbiased advice, exceptional service.

First Time Buyer Report

Bradford & Bingley’s First-time Buyer Report

1 Figures from the fourth annual Bradford & Bingley (B&B) First-time Buyer (FTB) Report has revealed that FTBs’ housing wish list is topped by two-bed properties with good transport links.

2 B&B said that FTBs appeared to be eschewing the idea of living near the bright lights of pubs and restaurants in their hunt for the ideal starter property.

3 The study, undertaken by YouGov, questioned 1,456 FTB adults and showed that 68 per cent of respondents said having a property with a minimum of two bedrooms was their top priority.

4 For 55 per cent of those with a smaller budget, having a property with at least one separate bedroom, as opposed to a studio or bed-sit, was an important requirement and came second on the wish list.

5 The study showed that 40 per cent of those surveyed were moving further out of their town or to a different town to be able to afford their first property.

6 B&B said it was no surprise therefore that 46 per cent of those questioned said that it was essential to have good transport links close to their chosen property.

7 This was particularly so for Londoners, who listed having good transport links as their number one priority, taking 78 per cent of the FTBs’ vote.

8 For those who drive the extra distance to work, good parking also came high up on the list for 46 per cent of people, taking joint third position.

9 ‘Having a nice garden’ came in at number five in the wish list, garnering 35 per cent of the vote.

10 A garden was followed by ‘choosing a home in a specific road or location’ for 31 per cent and ‘having a home in good decorative condition’ for 25 per cent.

11 The study showed that women were much more concerned with having a nice garden than men, polling at 40 per cent and 28 per cent respectively.

12 The proximity to bars and restaurants came low down the list, with just 13 per cent of the vote, missing the top 10 and featuring at number 13.

13 When it comes to family ties, FTBs showed they were willing to cut them when making their first step onto the property ladder.

14 Living close to family and friends only just featured in the top 10, coming in at number eight with 23 per cent.

15 Family was just ahead of ‘low council tax band’. For women living close to family was of greater importance than it was to men, at 26 per cent and 19 per cent respectively.

16 For 4 per cent of FTBs there was no other criteria other than just being the owner of their very own home.

17 Gus Park, director of intermediary sales at Mortgage Express, B&B’s specialist lending arm, commented: “Buying your first home is probably the largest financial commitment that an individual can make. Therefore it’s important to get it right.”

18 He said making a wish list was an ideal way for FTBs to work out exactly what their priorities were when searching for a home and highlighted the criteria they would be happy to compromise on.

19 Park added they were surprised but reassured to see the majority of FTBs approached the property search sensibly, opting for properties with a number of bedrooms, good transport links and nice gardens.

20 Park said: “These properties are perfect for selling on when the time eventually comes to make the next step up. Proving that, no matter how strong the desire is to own one’s own home, it is important not to rush into buying the first affordable property on the market and to keep in mind your ultimate goal of owning the ideal home.

Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service

For more information on buying your first home visit us at http://www.kinetic-fs.co.uk/
or if you would like to find out more about 100% mortgages click here.

Monday, 17 September 2007

This week in the press


The news this week is not good reading for many of us in the mortgage market, and it seems the back-to-work blues after the long Summer holiday have hit home early.
You can’t escape the news of the US non-conforming crisis in the press. This time we have the news in MA that Barclays has been forced to call on the Bank of England’s emergency funds due to a ‘technical breakdown’ in the UK clearing system. With LIBOR running at 6.8 per cent as I write, you can probably understand how technical things are getting.
The crisis is reported to be hitting jobs in the banking sector, according to FSA, as the liquidity crunch hits home, while we have seen sweeping criteria changes from the likes of GMAC-RFC and Mortgages plc. MM has been talking to some prime lenders who believe they will also start to feel the impact as the credit crunch forces them to tighten criteria even to consumers with clean credit records.
While the non-conforming market is still trying to find some solid ground, there is some disturbing news in MS. The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors has reported repossessions are up 32 per cent in Q2 this year compared with Q1, and estimates the total number for 2007 to be 45,000 – a 50 per cent rise. No surprise really, as those people who need to re-finance quickly are struggling to find a lender willing to help.
Housing and repossessions
MI is reporting Alliance & Leicester research that claims 63 per cent of brokers would welcome more regulation. This time it is the buy-to-let market, which, if you believe the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ data, is still growing. The market is worth £38 billion, but just the ‘let-to-buy’ element of the business is currently in a regulated environment. Articles in both FA and MM are both predicting house price falls – one stating by as much as 30 per cent in some areas of the country.
This again is based on the US, where they have seen homes fall in value by 18 per cent in the past 12 months amid warnings from a former US Treasury Secretary that they are heading for a recession. On the positive side, July lending was up by 12 per cent at £21.3 billion according to the BBA, reflecting the high levels of remortgaging taking place at the moment, while the average first-time buyer (FTB) now has get a mortgage £108,000 – up from the £36,000 they had to secure 10 years ago to get onto the property ladder. Compare this to the FTB’s average income; in 1996 it was £17,300, now it stands at just under £34,000. You can see why affordability is key to lending in this market.
Fraud
The discovery of the Thamesmead fraud also gets plenty of column inches, especially with the size of the potential profit to be made out of the illegal activity. With figures of £4 million being banded around as the amount of money to be made, it’s easy to see why this activity is so attractive to the criminal element. There are calls to improve the information brokers receive to help them spot fraud much earlier in the process.
Finally, as we see the extension of Home Information Packs in England and Wales extended to three-bed properties, there is plenty of comment about the value of Energy Performance Certificates (EPC). Research in MI indicates that a third of us would be influenced by the EPC in the pack in our purchase decision. Further research by Halifax suggests half of us want to live in detached houses with one in five preferring a new build property and 30 per cent in the country.
unbiased advice, exceptional service

More news on house prices

Information contained in the Home Asking Price Index has supported fears that the country's housing market is spiralling into trouble. Findings from Home.co.uk's Home Asking Price Index have shown six out of nine regions in England registered a drop in asking price in September. The asking price of homes in Greater London are falling fastest of all, by 1.2%, with the overall drop for England and Wales sitting at 0.4%. This equates to a loss of £1,030 in a single month for the average homeowner, while the average London property lost £4,208.

The recent international market upheaval seems to have been the catalyst for triggering this much-anticipated tipping point, as fear of default has forced mortgage lenders to price out sub-prime buyers with additional risk premiums. “With wage inflation falling, interest rates rising, and house prices surging up for over a year, a correction was inevitable, The housing market now looks to be changing rapidly to favour buyers over sellers.” UK mortgage lenders were earlier criticised by a Financial Services Authority report in July for not properly checking the creditworthiness of homebuyers they were lending to.

But this warning about irresponsible lending came far too late to avert a problem that has been growing for years – one which is estimated by the FSA to affect 8% of the mortgage market. The sub-prime fall-out for UK house prices could be very serious, with fewer buyers able to raise finances and demand falling further. We could also see a negative effect on supply. An increasing number of heavily indebted borrowers being forced to sell may trigger a further sell-off from property speculators wishing to reduce their debt burden as capital gains can no longer be made.

The report concludes that until the balance between buyers and sellers is restored, house prices will continue to slide. A cut in the Bank of England base rate could give some temporary respite to homeowners but that could let inflation off its tight leash and land the economy in much deeper water.

Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service.

Latest on Northern Rock


Northern Rock’s shares have fallen sharply after the lender was forced to obtain emergency funding from the Bank of England. The shares plunged in value by 32 per cent overnight, after the Bank of England became 'lender of last resort', offering Northern Rock unlimited funding. The turbulence currently being experienced in the wholesale markets has hit the lender hard and industry experts have voiced fears that it may end up going bust.
However Northern Rock has stated that they currently remain solvent, although it admitted that its 2007 profits will inevitably take a hit. Northern Rock’s chief executive, Adam J Applegarth, said:
“We are seeing extreme conditions in global liquidity, which have impacted on world markets. As a result, we have taken prudent action to rein back our lending until markets normalise. Against that background it is inevitable, albeit disappointing, that our profits will be affected. “We remain focused on prime lending in the UK mortgage market and our credit quality remains robust.
The support of the Bank of England through this facility reflects a recognition that Northern Rock is solvent, exceeds its regulatory capital requirement and has a good quality loan book. “In these extreme times we are pleased to have a high quality asset base and remain confident in the excellence of our strong customer franchise, our efficient business platform and our well-known brand."
Chancellor Alistair Darling, added: ""Northern Rock can draw on [the funding] when it requires, but it means it can carry on trading, people can use their accounts in the normal way, they carry on making their mortgage payments in the usual way, Northern Rock will be able to carry on its business."
The industry has this to say
Bank of England Responding to its decision to step in and provide ‘unlimited’ funding for Northern Rock should the situation require it, the Bank of England released a statement which said:
“The decision to provide a liquidity support facility to Northern Rock reflects the difficulties that it has had in accessing longer term funding and the mortgage securitisation market, on which Northern Rock is particularly reliant. “In its role as lender of last resort, the Bank of England stands ready to make available facilities in comparable circumstances, where institutions face short-term liquidity difficulties.
“This facility will be available to help Northern Rock to fund its operations during the current period of turbulence in financial markets while Northern Rock works to secure an orderly resolution to its current liquidity problems.”
CML The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) remained optimistic, with director general Michael Coogan commenting: "Consumers need to understand that the problem for lenders generally at the moment is in raising funds, not in lending quality.
"The Bank of England would not have provided the loan to Northern Rock if it had concerns about the quality of the lender's own business. "All lenders are facing funding pressure at the moment, and what they need is a return to more normal market conditions as quickly as possible. We welcome the Bank's intervention and confirmation that it is keeping a close eye on the situation.
FSA The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has said that: “Northern Rock is solvent, exceeds its regulatory capital requirement and has a good quality loan book.”
BBA The British Bankers' Association (BBA) has advised borrowers not to fear the worst in a statement released on Friday: “Northern Rock is a sound and safe bank and there is absolutely no reason for either mortgage customers or savers to worry.
“All Friday’s announcement from the Bank of England, Treasury and the Financial Services Authority means is that Northern Rock has had to make alternative arrangements to meet its normal everyday short term borrowing requirements.
“The British banking system is carefully regulated and overseen which ensures that all banks operate safely and prudently in the interest of their customers.”
unbiased advice, exceptional service.
If you would like to discuss any issues raised in this article please contact us here
Northern Rock offer the following products:

Friday, 14 September 2007

FSA sets precedent in approaching GMAC-RFC



The FSA has set a market precedent by approaching a lender to ask them to place consumers’ mortgages in the wake of Victoria Mortgages entering administration.

Victoria announced on Monday it was entering administration, and said GMAC-RFC had agreed to look at cases in its pipeline that were due to complete imminently.

Julie Gaskin, corporate relations manager at GMAC-RFC, said the regulator had approached it two days before the news was made public to discuss it helping consumers that would be affected by Victoria’s collapse. She said:
“We were contacted by the FSA over the weekend to discuss whether we would be able to help a certain amount of people who were due to complete in the next three days. Its main concern was that borrowers in that position were the innocent parties, and so we said we would help.”

Sue Anderson, head of external affairs at the Council of Mortgage Lenders, said while the previous regulator for building societies had followed the same approach to protect consumers, the current situation was unusual. She commented: “I do not know with respect to the newer lenders what the market norms should be. No doubt other lenders will say why was it [GMAC], and not us, but there is always an element of that. It is the reuglator’s job to ensure an orderly environment.”

Matthew Wyles, group development director, echoed Anderson’s sentiments the regulator had done its duty in protecting consumers, but hinted other lenders had been approached to help, adding: “We should not assume the FSA only spoke to one lender.”

Robin Gordon-Walker, spokesman for the FSA, said while the decision to approach GMAC had been taken by “very senior figures”, the regulator would not discuss why it was chosen, as it did not want to comment on individual firms.
unbiased advice, exceptional service.

House price growth turns down



Demand slowed sharply in August, with the fallout significantly affecting house prices.

This is the first time since October 2005 that prices have seen such a dip, and 1.8 percent more Chartered Surveyors reported a fall rather than rise in house prices, down from 10.8 reporting a rise in July.

Demand also continues to weaken as rising interest rates weigh upon buyer affordability.
This trend is most prevalent in the West Midlands, the North West and East Anglia. However, London is yet to be affected by credit market turmoil and remains the region with the strongest price growth in England.

New Buyer enquiries declined for the ninth consecutive month and at the fastest pace since August 2004, with potential buyers remaining cautious as the effect of interest rate rises filter through.

In addition, new instructions to sell property fell for the third month in succession. Confidence in household finances remains strong and vendors remain under little pressure to sell. The stock of unsold property on surveyor’s books declined with levels down ten percent on year ago levels.
Significantly the number of four bedroom houses on the market have declined by 51 percent on year ago levels, possibly pushed by the August deadline for Home Information Packs (HIPs).

RICS spokesman, Ian Perry, said: “Potential house buyers have become far more cautious as they wait and see what affect interest rate rises will have on household finances. Affordability is at its most stretched in over a decade and many will worry that rising mortgage repayments will prove a step to far.

“The market will soften further, going into the autumn, reducing some impetus from those that have been chasing a rapidly moving target. HIPs have reduced the number of four bedroom family properties coming onto the market, making family homes even more difficult to purchase.”
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Northern Rock's Shares Fall



Northern Rock’s shares have fallen sharply after the lender was bailed out by the Bank of England.

The shares plunged in value by 24 per cent overnight, after the Bank of England became 'lender of last resort', offering Northern Rock unlimited funding.
The turbulence currently being experienced in the wholesale markets has hit the lender hard and industry experts have voiced fears that it may end up going bust. However Northern Rock has stated that they currently remain solvent, although it admitted that its 2007 profits will inevitably take a hit.

Northern Rock’s chief executive, Adam J Applegarth, said: “We are seeing extreme conditions in global liquidity, which have impacted on world markets. As a result, we have taken prudent action to rein back our lending until markets normalise. Against that background it is inevitable, albeit disappointing, that our profits will be affected.

“We remain focused on prime lending in the UK mortgage market and our credit quality remains robust. The support of the Bank of England through this facility reflects a recognition that Northern Rock is solvent, exceeds its regulatory capital requirement and has a good quality loan book.

“In these extreme times we are pleased to have a high quality asset base and remain confident in the excellence of our strong customer franchise, our efficient business platform and our well-known brand."

Chancellor Alistair Darling, added: ""Northern Rock can draw on [the funding] when it requires, but it means it can carry on trading, people can use their accounts in the normal way, they carry on making their mortgage payments in the usual way, Northern Rock will be able to carry on its business."

Industry reaction

As the industry wakes up to a media frenzy surrounding Northern Rock’s financial plight, Michael Coogan, CML director general, commented: "Consumers need to understand that the problem for lenders generally at the moment is in raising funds, not in lending quality.

"All lenders are facing funding pressure at the moment, and what they need is a return to more normal market conditions as quickly as possible. We welcome the Bank's intervention and confirmation that it is keeping a close eye on the situation.

"Ultimately, the Bank of England would not have provided the loan to Northern Rock if it had concerns about the quality of the lender's own business.
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Wednesday, 12 September 2007

Mortgage Lending Slows in July


The number and value of mortgages taken out by both home-buyers and those remortgaging fell in July, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders. But lending not accounted for by house purchase or remortgaging (primarily made up of further advances and buy-to-let) rose to its highest-ever value - £7.8 billion - and accounted for 23% of the total, its highest ever proportion.

There were 94,000 loans for house purchase totalling £14.8 billion in July, and 92,000 remortgage loans totalling £11.5 billion.

The number of loans to first-time buyers fell by 7% from June to 32,400, and the value fell by 4% to £4.4 billion. Affordability for first-time buyers continued to worsen, with the typical first-time buyer income multiple rising to a record 3.39 in July, up from 3.37 the previous month and 3.23 a year earlier. First-time buyers taking out loans in July typically committed 19.7% of their income to pay their mortgage interest.

Fixed rates maintained their popularity in July, accounting for 79% of house purchase and remortgage loans. But the appetite for fixed rates may be on the wane if people believe that rates have now peaked.

Michael Coogan, CML Director General, commented:

"A slight fall in lending between June and July has emerged for the third year in a row, so of course we cannot read too much into a single month's figures. But the long-anticipated slowdown in the housing and mortgage markets may now be beginning to materialise.
"Last week's MPC decision to hold rates was exactly as expected. Both market conditions and sentiment are coming off the boil, and affordability is ever more stretched, but consumers should not expect any immediate easing in the financial pressures they face."
unbiased advice, exceptional service.

Property rents are on the up


Strong tenant demand pushes rents

Paragon, RICS and ARLA have confirmed that tenant demand is still growing strongly.

On the back of a slowing housing market, the research has shown that higher borrowing costs and the uncertain outlook for house prices have been the catalyst within the private rented sector.

However Paragon have said that this increased level of demand is creating an upward pressure on rents.

In this positive environment, investors expect to grow the size of their portfolios over the next year by 5%, from 11.5 to 12.1 properties, according to Paragon’s latest survey of landlords. In value terms, they expect the average portfolio to be worth £1.5 million in 12 months’ time.
In addition, RICS have found that rents are growing at record levels, with surveyors expecting particularly strong tenant demand into the autumn as first-time buyers delay property purchase. Nearly a third more chartered surveyors reported a rise in tenant lettings with 20% more landlord instructions compared with 8% in the previous quarter.

This view is confirmed by ARLA, whose quarterly survey of letting agents today reveals that tenant demand outstrips supply in all areas of the rental market, with a knock-on effect on achievable rent levels, which have risen in all parts of the country. Paragon’s latest Buy-to-Let Index shows average rents rising at an annualised rate of 12.7%, to reach £10,914.

There is broad agreement that buy-to-let is a beneficiary of a softer housing market, as would-be homebuyers defer house purchase and find themselves competing with migrants, students and first jobbers, among others, for a finite supply of rented homes. The private rented sector continues to expand steadily to meet this growth in demand for accommodation and landlords add to their portfolios in the knowledge that tenant demand is buoyant and rents continue to rise.
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Tuesday, 11 September 2007

Is an interest only mortgage right for me?


The very mention of interest only will draw differing responses, depending on who you are talking to. Prima facie it looks like interest only has a public relations problem in some quarters. However, the subject does deserve a thorough examination, especially as sales of interest only mortgages appears to be increasing.
The signs of increasing popularity have attracted the attentions of the Financial Services Authority (FSA). Interest only is seen as a possible issue and as such is firmly on the regulator’s radar. Plus there has been some negative comment in the consumer press, which does not help consumer confidence.
Consumers need to be confident that the product they have purchased works for them in the short term and will be durable in the longer term. This is where brokers can drive home their advantage by conducting regular reviews of the customer’s needs as circumstances can change. That last thing we need are worried and confused customers.
As with many things one size does not fit all and cases need to be looked at on an individual basis.
Regulatory starting point
Back in 2006 an audit recorded 23,200 mortgages where there was no record of the repayment vehicle. MCOB 11 makes it a clear requirement of lenders to consider a customer’s ability to repay before they enter into a mortgage contract. Plus the FSA has made it clear that for interest only mortgages it expects lenders’ policy to be expanded to include a further three things: how the lender checks the strategy of the customer to repay the mortgage; the plausibility of the customer’s strategy; and how this is taken into account in the affordability calculation. For both lenders and intermediaries, this is pretty unambiguous. This poses some questions for brokers. The level of client documentation, the factfind and notes of client preferences are essential. Good standards of record-keeping is a recurring theme in file reviews conducted by the regulator.
The circumstances surrounding interest only are viewed with such gravity that the FSA published a detailed research report in December 2006. The report was based on 856 telephone interviews conducted between 4-26 September 2006. The sample showed variation across a number of characteristics, demonstrating that holders of interest only mortgages were not a group with similar characteristics. Variations were found in terms of their age, income levels, loan-to-value (LTV) ratio and the size of the loan. A significant minority of borrowers had no idea or definite plan on how they would pay back the capital they borrowed. A large proportion of these borrowers admitted that dealing with finance was best left to the experts, and many had taken an interest only mortgage because it was recommended to them by a professional.
The majority of borrowers who had an interest only mortgage but no repayment plan indicated they did have a recognised repayment plan or other strategy in place to pay back the loan. However, in a number of cases the credibility of this repayment strategy may be open to question. The ability to meet repayments and other commitments is a consideration for mortgage holders; one in five respondents said they would struggle to meet other financial commitments if interest rates rose by one percentage point. A high proportion of respondents had a correct understanding of an interest only mortgage and the majority had a reasonable understanding of the associated risks. All in all, a bit of a mixed bag but not the disaster than some were predicting.
A broken link
Part of the problem is that the link between interest only and other products has been broken. I am not advocating the sale of mortgage endowments, but the policies were actually attached to the lender via the legal process of assignment. With the choice and flexibility in investment products, this link is broken. That flexibility is a two-way street – great in some respects but with drawbacks in others. There is an element of risk attached to stock market-linked investments, so the customer’s attitude to risk is an essential ingredient in the product choice.
Level of information
The key to successful sales of interest only mortgages is the level of information that the customer is provided with – not only through the sales process but the entire life of the mortgage. The customer must be in full possession of the facts and that they need another vehicle to repay the capital at the end of the term. This needs to be reinforced via the annual statement and reminder letters.
One of the fears is that there will be a raft of customers calling at the end of their mortgage term querying why their capital has not been repaid. With the levels of information provided, this seems like a very remote possibility. Talk of a future huge mis-selling scandal is wide of the mark.
Suitability is a far trickier issue. Customers come in differing shapes and sizes. What about the self-employed individual with variable income flows? In this situation, interest only could be a very good option with the client making capital repayments when it suits their individual circumstances. Young professionals are another example, with the possibility of rapid salary increases.
What is more difficult is the vexed issue of affordability. With house prices at an all time high, affordability has never been more stretched. The temptation is that customers could be stretching affordability by using the interest only option.
There is evidence that cases are being submitted citing the sale of the property at some future date. Where the lender’s policy allows it, these cases should carry further safeguards.
Final analysis
Interest only is a further example of the far-reaching flexibility in the UK market. It is an invaluable tool for brokers recommending a truly flexible approach in managing a mortgage. It is true that the regulatory background has tightened, but this is only prudent. It is worth recalling that interest only amounts to about 25 per cent of all new mortgages. The fact is that the ‘one-size fits all’ approach does not work with interest only. With the enhanced levels of information being provided through the life of the mortgage and at the application stage, the customer has little reason to plea ignorance. It is worth reiterating that good record-keeping for lenders and brokers is fundamental in the whole process.
unbiased advice, exceptional service

Buy Now... Pay Later

This week, it was revealed that Britons have accumulated so much personal debt that the total sum will exceed the gross domestic product (GDP) for the first time in UK history. In a report prepared by accounting consultancy firm Grant Thornton, it was revealed that personal debt in the UK now stands at £1,345 billion. In contrast, GDP for 2007 is expected to peak around £1,333 billion.

It will take the UK until January 2008 to produce enough goods and services to meet the amount of personal debt that Britons have incurred. The debt has been accumulated largely through borrowing on credit cards, taking out loans and overdrafts or obtaining mortgages on a property. Fortunately, most consumer debt is secured and can be repaid over several years, otherwise we would be technically bankrupt,

Buy now, pay later

"Britain's huge level of consumer debt is symptomatic of the country's well-established buy-now-pay-later culture.

We can no longer generate enough GDP to cover the amount we owe." The credit culture is something that a number of commentators have picked up on and a significant proportion have blamed both the ease of access to credit and media promotion of a glamorous lifestyle as seemingly enjoyed by celebrities and the rich and famous. In a recent Virgin Money survey, three out of four women respondents said they aspired to, and indeed felt under pressure to attain, the perfect looks and designer wardrobes of the various celebrities who dominate the glossy magazines, internet and television.

Could a remortgage help to simplify your debt?

She's got to have it

This has led to the average adult female in the UK spending around £713 a year on designer clothing, accessories and grooming in an effort to live it large like the celebrities do. Over the past year, British women have spent a combined £830 million on designer bags and shoes, £873 million on hairstyling and extensions and an incredible £262 million on tanning treatments. Spending money on aspirational whims is something that has come in for criticism from Lee Berry Director of Kinetic Financial Solutions says that "people need to make better decisions". This is particularly true, he added, when it comes to borrowing more money to pay off debt - something an alarming number of people do. Borrowing more money to pay off debts can seem like an attractive option. After all, it usually consolidates the existing debts and allows for one straightforward monthly payment. But there is evidence to suggest that a lot of people who go through debt consolidation continue to spend on credit - sometimes even using their consolidation loan to do so. You need to see consolidation as a new beginning and not as a reason or excuse to borrow more.

Many more lenders saying no to IVA

Another thing that borrowers may want to consider is the fact that lenders appear to be taking a harder line on entering into Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs). These have become increasingly popular in recent years, as they allow the borrower to make an arrangement to repay a proportion of the debt over a fixed time and have the rest written off. Lenders are becoming concerned that IVAs are being perceived as a soft option to bankruptcy, according to Debt Action. It can no longer be assumed that they will automatically agree to enter into one and anyone who assumes that they will is "heading for trouble", the advisory service warned.

Could a Secured Loan could help to simplify your debt and save you money each month?

Kinetic Financial Solutions
unbiased advice, exceptional service.

Think carefully before securing other debts against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. There may be a fee charged for mortgage advice. The amount will depend on your circumstances but we estimate it will no more than 1% of the loan arranged. Kinetic Financial Solutions is an appointed representative of Mortgage Intelligence Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.